Windham Portfolio Advisor
  • Windham Portfolio Advisor Support
  • Installation
    • Installing the Windham Portfolio Advisor
    • Installation Prerequisites
    • Installation FAQ
      • License Key Management
  • Time Series
  • Managing Custom Time Series
  • Custom Time Series Excel Add-in
  • Custom Time Series Utility
  • Updating the Windham Time Series Database
  • Mixing Data Periodicities within a Case File
  • Hedged and Unhedged Time Series
  • Overlays
  • Expected Risk
    • Annualizing Volatility and Return
    • Correlation
    • Covariance
    • Exponential Risk
    • Quiet and Turbulent Risk
    • Series Filter
    • Views (Risk and Correlation)
  • Expected Returns
    • Historical Returns
    • Equilibrium Returns
    • Implied Returns
    • Black-Litterman
    • Blend
    • Estimating Future Value: Arithmetic or Geometric
  • Optimization
    • Multi-goal Optimization
    • Transaction Costs and Turnover Controls
    • Risk Aversion
    • Full-Scale Optimization
  • Simulation
    • Simulation Methods
  • Exposure to Loss
    • Value at Risk
    • Probability of Loss
  • Risk Budgets
    • Risk Budgets
    • Value at Risk Sensitivities
  • Factor Analysis
    • Windham Factors
    • Factor Analysis
  • Cash Flow Analysis
    • Cash Flow Rules
    • Distribution of Wealth
    • Target Wealth Probability
  • Miscellaneous
    • Effective Tax Rates
    • Shadow Assets, Shadow Liabilities, and Illiquidity
    • Asset-liability Optimization
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Power Utility
  • Bilinear Utility (Kinked)
  • S-Shaped Utility
  • Video
  1. Optimization

Full-Scale Optimization

When higher moments matter

PreviousRisk AversionNextSimulation Methods

Last updated 4 years ago

“Full-scale optimization relies on sophisticated search algorithms to identify the optimal portfolio given any set of return distributions and based on any description of investor preferences" .”

Rather than using summary statistics such as mean, variance, and correlation, full-scale optimization utilizes the full sample of returns based on plausible utility functions. Mean-variance optimization assumes either that returns are normally distributed or that investors have quadratic utility. However, asset returns are not exactly normally distributed in practice, and investors are rarely as averse to upside deviations as downside or prefer less wealth to more wealth.

While both approaches to optimization suffer from estimation error, mean variance optimization also incurs approximation error . While full-scale optimization returns the in-sample optimal portfolio, parametric optimization returns an approximate in-sample optimal portfolio.

Historical returns are used to generate data for full-scale optimization. However, to incorporate an investor’s views regarding expected returns, we adjust the means of the data accordingly. We assume the historical experience for risk since we want to preserve and account for higher moments.

We include three common expected utility functions for Full-Scale optimization:

Power Utility

The most common utility function used is the power utility function. Power utility functions assume a preference for upside deviations and have positive slopes, which reflects a preference for increasing wealth. These utility functions assume that investors prefer to preserve the same percentage allocation to risky assets as their wealth changes.

The power utility function is similar to mean-variance (MV) optimization as it approximates the log-wealth utility by using a quadratic function. Power utility functions are always upward sloping in contrast to the quadratic function which has a turning point.

Bilinear Utility (Kinked)

An investor might want to maintain a minimum standard of living, or need to maintain a wealth so as not to breach an agreement on a loan. A kinked utility function describes this preference, where it changes abruptly at a specified wealth or return level. This utility function penalizes solutions that breach a given threshold. It is defined by a log-wealth function above the threshold and by a steeper linear function below the threshold return.

S-Shaped Utility

Video

The following video describes what is Full-Scale Optimization in the Windham Portfolio Advisor

If an investor must choose between certain gain and an uncertain outcome with a higher expected value he will often choose certain gain. If it is a choice between a certain loss and an uncertain outcome with a lower expected value he will often choose the uncertain outcome. This behavior is captured by an S-shaped value function (), where investors are risk-seeking below a certain threshold, and risk-averse above it.

Kahnemann and Tversky 1979
(Adler and Kritzman 2007)
(Adler and Kritzman 2007)
Full-scale Optimization
Log Wealth Utility Function
Bilinear Utility Function
S-Shaped Value Function